Tue Sep 11 10:26:45 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] size of requests stored in sl_log_x
- Next message: [Slony1-general] size of requests stored in sl_log_x
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/11/07, Cyril SCETBON <cscetbon.ext at orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > OK. > You don't think that it alter the performance doing 100 updates for a > table with 100 atributes versus one update on 2 columns ? We certainly > have to accept poor performance when applying log if we use log shipping > in this case ? > Sure. How do you figure out what that statement ought to be? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20070911/= ceaf98f1/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] size of requests stored in sl_log_x
- Next message: [Slony1-general] size of requests stored in sl_log_x
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list