Sun Sep 9 10:58:53 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] different masters for different tables
- Next message: [Slony1-general] different masters for different tables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2007/9/9, Tim Bowden <tim.bowden at westnet.com.au>: > Hopefully that will scale well as I've > got 100+ master db's. over 100 partitions? you should be careful as slony1 has some communication overhead which grows quadratically with the number of nodes in a cluster. google for "slony communication costs" I'm not sure if it applies to your situation though... I've never tested such setup, maybe we should wait untill someone more experienced gives a word about it maybe I should not say this here ... but at worst, you will have to drop slony in favour of other (simpler) solution - like home-made trigger-based tool or other replication engine (londiste?)
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] different masters for different tables
- Next message: [Slony1-general] different masters for different tables
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list