On Nov 22, 2007 5:14 PM,  <slony1-general at lists.slony.info> wrote:
> On 22/11/2007 19:08, postgres at dac.e4ward.com wrote:
> > documentation, but it seems slonik is always suposed to be installed
> > and run from the same server where postgres is installed.
>
> That's not my understanding....in particular, since connection strings
> passed to slon always include host and port fields, I don't see why they
> need to be on the same machine as the DB.


I understand that and in fact, as I said, I'm successfully running the
slave slon daemon from the master server, remotely. BUT I happen to
have postgres installed on that server too.

My problem is not where to run slon, because I'm running it always
from servers where postgres is running too. My problem is to execute
slonik remotely from a server where I don't have neither postgres or
slon suning.

Do I explain myself?

Thanks a lot for your answer.

-- 
Diego Algorta Casamayou
http://www.oboxodo.com - http://diego.algorta.net