Wed May 16 12:18:28 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: Am I going to end up in deadlock hell for this?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: Am I going to end up in deadlock hell for this?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
jason at buberel.org writes: > Thank you for the kindly RTFM :) > > To quote from the documentation: This ID must be unique across all > sets; you cannot have two tables in the same cluster with the same ID. > > Which leads me to ask whether or not either of the following two > statements are true of slony: > > Within a single cluster, a table can only be a member of one set. > > - or - > > Within a single cluster, a table can be a member of more than one set > as long as each of those sets has the same origin node. The first statement is the true one, and it actually furthermore crosses clusters... A table can only successfully be a member of one set. -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="ca.afilias.info" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];; <http://dba2.int.libertyrms.com/> Christopher Browne (416) 673-4124 (land)
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: Am I going to end up in deadlock hell for this?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Re: Am I going to end up in deadlock hell for this?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list