Fri Jun 1 14:49:12 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Does slonik EXECUTE SCRIPT call waits for comands termination?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Does slonik EXECUTE SCRIPT call waits for comands termination?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6/1/2007 12:53 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: >> Looking at the code, it seems that EXECUTE SCRIPT doesn't actually >> record the events seqno in the admin conninfo. Which means that WAIT FOR >> EVENT will wait for an earlier event, or even nothing. > > This sounds like a serious bug to me. But this. . . > >> Unfortunately the >> same is true for SYNC in 1.2.9. > > . . . sounds even worse. Does this mean that some syncs could never > get recorded? No, I meant that slonik's SYNC command does not remember the event seqno of the SYNC it generated. Thus, SYNC+WAIT does effectively nothing. It is fixed in the REL_1_2_STABLE as well as HEAD. I will fix the EXECUTE part too and then I think it is seriously time for 1.2.10. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Does slonik EXECUTE SCRIPT call waits for comands termination?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Does slonik EXECUTE SCRIPT call waits for comands termination?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list