Totally untested and probably insanely wrong patch attached.

Andrew


On 7/19/07, Jan Wieck <JanWieck at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 7/18/2007 1:48 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > Andrew Hammond wrote:
> >> Our binaries (slon and slonik) don't currently support the --version
> >> convention. Would it make sense to add -v or --version or -V which
> >> returns the version?
> > Jan added the "-v" switch almost three years ago; looking at CVS:
>
> I don't mind if it gets aliased to --version though.
>
>
> Jan
>
> --
> #=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
> #=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D JanWieck at Yahoo.com #
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: slony_longopts.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1979 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20070719=
/beaea91a/slony_longopts.bin