Thu Jul 5 06:25:56 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Soliciting ideas for v2.0
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Soliciting ideas for v2.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 14:31 -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: > What I see here is that we are trying to come up with a special case > optimization for mass-deletes. No mass insert or update operations will > benefit from any of this. Do people do mass deletes that much that we > really have to worry about them? > Yes, there are a few places that I can think of where we would directly benefit from this. Trimming data from very active log tables is the main case. We also recently had a case where we needed to delete a fair amount of data from a table quickly to prevent degraded performance in a front line system. We ended up dropping the table, deleting and re-subbing. We were not is a situation where we could have done smaller batches that slony would have liked. -- Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106 Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Soliciting ideas for v2.0
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Soliciting ideas for v2.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list