Tue Jan 30 11:09:42 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] did the remove-indexes-during-initial-copy patch ever appear?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] REPLICATIONUSER really needs to be super-user?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello, I suggest that these references that refer to "COPY SET" be updated to refer to "SUBSCRIBE SET": # grep -R 'COPY SET' faq.sgml slonik_ref.sgml startslons.sgml faq.sgml:Further hurting performane, the <command>COPY SET</command> event slonik_ref.sgml: the <command>COPY SET</command> process winds up doing more work than should be startslons.sgml:initial <command>COPY SET</command>. The problem that came up in that startslons.sgml:restarting slon, thereby restarting the <command>COPY SET</command> startslons.sgml:<command>COPY SET</command> in progress.</para> #################### I was reading about the effects of COPY SET, and was trying to figure out where the user interface to it was-- at what point in the process a COPY SET happens. As I understand, it happens only as part of issuing a "SUBSCRIBE SET". If that's correct, the documentation would improved to consistently refer to operation from the perspective of the user. Referring to COPY SET without a connection to how it is triggered is confusing. Mark
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] did the remove-indexes-during-initial-copy patch ever appear?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] REPLICATIONUSER really needs to be super-user?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list