Mark Stosberg wrote:
> This post suggested a performance improvement to the initial copy might
> appear in 1.2, by removing indexes and re-applying them.
> 
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/2005-June/002285.html
> 
>>From reading RELEASE-1.2.0, I didn't see a mention to that effect. Is an
> optimization like this in place?

Sorry. I think I found the answer in the FAQ:

http://slony1.projects.postgresql.org/slony1-1.2.6/doc/adminguide/faq.html#AEN5936

This appears to have been fixed in 1.1.5.

Thanks!

   Mark