Fri Jan 19 07:37:35 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] subscriber box drive failure....recovery
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 on postgres 8.2.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 16:11 +0100, Sascha.Spreitzer at izb.de wrote: > Can you explain why? > How can a schema be left in an incorrect way if its being deleted? Please reply to the list on all correspondence. Slony does some ugly hacks to the subscribers (like re-points triggers to indexes to disable them). Dropping the schema like you've suggested does not undo these changes. Brad. > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: slony1-general-bounces at gborg.postgresql.org > [mailto:slony1-general-bounces at gborg.postgresql.org] Im Auftrag von Brad > Nicholson > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Januar 2007 15:40 > An: Sascha.Spreitzer at izb.de > Cc: slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > Betreff: Re: [Slony1-general] subscriber box drive failure....recovery > > > On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 15:27 +0100, Sascha.Spreitzer at izb.de wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Drop the _<clustername> schema. (drop schema _<clustername>;) > > This is the incorrect way to do it. This can leave your schema in an > inconsistent state. There is a script to do this with (the name escapes > me right now) > -- Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106 Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] subscriber box drive failure....recovery
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony 1.1.5 on postgres 8.2.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list