Fri Jan 12 04:46:43 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] SLONY-I disadvantages
- Next message: [Slony1-general] SLONY-I disadvantages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Dun wrote: > Steve Singer wrote: >> What we have found much more painful is adding columns (or any other ALTER >> table) command to tables that are already being replicated. In the current >> version of slony this requires obtain an exclusive lock on all replicated >> tables in all sets. This essentially requires an outage/maintaince window >> to avoid deadlock. > > I thought that for execute script slonik requires an exclusive lock on all > replicated tables /in the same set/. > (http://linuxfinances.info/info/ddlchanges.html) That section of the manual could use some clarification. Read a few paragraphs down to the note arrow: Actually, as of version 1.1.5 and later, this is NOT TRUE. The danger of someone making DDL changes that crosses replication sets seems sufficiently palpable that slon(1) has been changed to lock ALL replicated tables,whether they are in the specified replication set or not. http://linuxfinances.info/info/stmtddlscript.html is a bit more clear on the subject. > > Regards > > MP >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] SLONY-I disadvantages
- Next message: [Slony1-general] SLONY-I disadvantages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list