Mark Stosberg wrote:
> Bernd Helmle wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:47:04 -0500, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>>       
>>>> well after the latest fixes in CVS they actually work(at least i use
>>>> them regulary) - and I think it is Bernds intention to take over
>>>> maintainance and actively fix them ...
>>>>         
>> Thats exactly my intention. I'm currently about to clean up the code and
>> to make them to use at least strict/warning. What we need for this kind
>> of tools is a reliable framework and regression tests, so that broken 
>> functionality could be detected. I have some ideas already...
>>     
>
> I'm also interested to help improve these tools, and expect to have some
> for it as well. I agree with the approach of getting "use
> strict/warnings" to work, as well as have some automated tests for the
> tools.
>
> Should I just keep sending patches to this list for nwo, or would direct
> access to an SCM system be preferable?
>
>   
If we weren't about to be migrating CVS to a new place, I'd be inclined
to add you to the committers list; you've had enough good changes to
warrant that, in my view.  (We'd have to have some discussion amongst
existing committers, but I don't imagine it would stir much controversy.)

For now, by all means, patch to the list; in a couple weeks, once the
world has changed, pester and we can look into direct access...