Wed Sep 27 11:48:44 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] SCM Alternatives
- Next message: [Slony1-general] SCM Alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/27/06, Vivek Khera <vivek at khera.org> wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Christopher Browne wrote: > > > That being said, the recent outage of gBorg represents something where > > using a distributed SCM (Git, Darcs, Mercurial, ...) would have turned > > the outage into a minor inconvenience. That is so because > > individuals' > > My understanding is that the svk software which layers on top of svn > provides such a distributed repository system, but I am not that > familiar with it. If that's the only problem we're solving by moving > from CVS, then I don't think it is worth the trouble. > svk does indeed use svn as a backend. Using svn for the server and svk when you need it on the client for off-line or distributed dev is a pretty decent combo. Most of the time I prefer to use just svn though. -bob
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] SCM Alternatives
- Next message: [Slony1-general] SCM Alternatives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list