On 9/26/2006 8:33 AM, Jacques Caron wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just wanted to make sure that the small issue I mentioned here:
> 
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/2006-January/003729.html
> 
> will be addressed in 1.2.0, as apparently the problem is still in the 
> latest CVS versions. It is definitely not critical, but it makes 
> quite a difference in initial replication time for large databases 
> with foreign keys.
> 
> I opened a bug (id 1585) yesterday should you wish to track it that way.

It would have been good to add this to the bug tracking back in January. 
As things stand right now I would say we make this change (and 
everything else lingering in the bug tracking) right after the 1.2 
release and shoot for a quick 1.2.1 in a couple of weeks.


Jan

> 
> Jacques.
> 
> At 17:14 15/09/2006, Christopher Browne wrote:
>>The fourth release candidate has been tagged and released.
>>
>>Both a source code and pre-build documentation are available, here:
>>    http://pgfoundry.org/frs/?group_id=1000122
>>
>>As Jan said,
>>    Everyone please test their failover and move_set scenarios thoroughly.
>>_______________________________________________
>>Slony1-general mailing list
>>Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
>>http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general


-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #