Mon May 22 08:48:46 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Change the slave's table name
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Change the slave's table name
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 06:10:49PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 04:24:23PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:41:37AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > > > No. But you could alter your source tables to have a source_machine > > > column. > > > > How would that allow for replicating from many into one? > > You need to alter your indexes too. So instead of a unique index on > (say) id, you put it on (id, hostid). Then you can have colliding > ids, but it doesn't matter, because the real key is (id,hostid). > > It's tricky, but you can often do it without application changes, as > long as you never do something dumb like SELECT *. Maybe I missed something, but wasn't the OP trying to replicate data from slaves back up to the master? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby at pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Change the slave's table name
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Change the slave's table name
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list