Mon May 15 08:22:34 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Segfault with Slony 1.1.5 and PG 8.1.3 on x86_64
- Next message: [Slony1-general] about large set sync data question (help!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Gavin Hamill wrote: > >>I'll give a REINDEX a blast tonight as Andrew Sullivan's suggested - >>hopefully that will reveal something strange, since we've been running >>with Slony for a couple of weeks now fault-free - certainly longer than >>the segfaults have been happening. >> >> > > Alas, a REINDEX of the affected table showed no output on the > commandline or in the logs, and I'm still seeing fairly regular (roughly > once a day) segfaults with exactly the same output from dmesg: > > postmaster[16589]: segfault at 0000000000000000 rip 00002aaaab5e8c00 rsp > 00007fffffffd418 error 4 > > As Jan Wieck was kind enough to help out picking through the core file > that postgres dropped previously, (hence I knew what table was in use), > I'm now back to square one with no idea why this crash is happening :( > > The most awkward part is that it causes the slon daemon to close, thus > replication to all slaves is frozen until I get notified of the segfault > and restart slon manually. :( FYI, there is *something* of a way around the "causes everything else to freeze" problem if it is a problem that the slon on the origin freezes. There is a "gensync" script in the tools directory which you could run every minute or so which simply generates a SYNC. It is configured to only generate a SYNC if there hasn't been one in [some interval of time] which means that if you pick the interval suitably, it will normally do absolutely nothing. That might at least help a bad situation...
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Segfault with Slony 1.1.5 and PG 8.1.3 on x86_64
- Next message: [Slony1-general] about large set sync data question (help!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list