Mon May 15 07:19:31 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Replicating across 10 machines?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony with PostgreSQL mainline
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:51:53PM -0700, George Courter wrote: > Is this feasible? As I add machines will there be some kind of n^2 > problem where at some point the communication overhead would be too > much? > > Could I do it with 1 set, or maybe I could split this set into finer > grain sets in order to make this scalable? No reason it shouldn't be possible, but you might want to have one machine act as a 'sub master' to take the load off the actual master. The submaster would be a slave of the master, and all the other slaves would point to the submaster. As for sets, that's more a management issue than a scaleability one. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby at pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Replicating across 10 machines?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony with PostgreSQL mainline
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list