Fri Feb 3 04:36:13 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] BUG: [SLONY1] slonik doesn't catch errors properly (ID: 1518) (new)
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Maintenance for sl_log_1.log_xid
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:39:52PM -0800, Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > > This is not vialable way of testing in all versions of PG we support, does > any body else have any ideas? Well, you could do it that way if running against [mumble 7.4 right?] or up, and fall back to the current method for earlier versions. Sort of ugly to code and maintain, though. Maybe keep this as a limitation until 7.3 is dropped? A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] BUG: [SLONY1] slonik doesn't catch errors properly (ID: 1518) (new)
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Maintenance for sl_log_1.log_xid
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list