May I plase have a little feedback on this?
pgsql 8.1 release is near, so we'll have to release pgAdmin III V1.4 
quite soon too. I'd really like to have correct slony support in it too; 
I'll have finish the work in the next very few weeks.

Regards,
Andreas



Andreas Pflug wrote:

> We've been discussing using nodes/paths to store information for 
> non-slon active node, but didn't come to a conclusion so far.
>
> Currently, listens will be generated for every path regardless of the 
> node's activity. If a node will never have a running slon daemon, 
> events for this node will collect and prevent cleanup of old events, 
> which is bad.
>
> As a fix, I'd propose to generate listens from paths only between 
> _active_ nodes, i.e. add "and N1.no_active and N2.no_active" to the 
> select condition in rebuildlistenentries(). A node that's not active 
> will never process events, and never generate events so IMHO it's 
> correct to have no listens for such nodes. In addition, 
> rebuildlistenentries() probably needs to be added to enablenode() and 
> disablenode() (as soon as it's implemented) too.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general