Wed Sep 7 23:09:48 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Forcing an existing node to copy data fresh
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Forcing an existing node to copy data fresh
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Jim Archer" <jim at archer.net> writes: > Hi All... > > I tried posting this question before, but it keeps getting trapped. I > think it's because of my use of the word S*U*B*S*C*R*I*B*E in the message > or in the subject, so here is a new try. > > While testing last night, I managed to get a node de-synced due to the way > I started a slon daemon. I figured that would be a good opportunity to > learn how to make a node start itself from scratch. > >>From the docs, it seemed that the S*U*B*S*C*R*I*B*E SET command would do > this if I issued it for a nore that was already inthe cluster. I issued > the command, but nothing happened. > > So, I am wondering (1) is this command should cause a working node to > recopy all the data from the provider node and, if not, (2) is there a way > to make a node do that? No, the "expected result" of submitting "that command" to a node already participating in a subscription is for the subscription provider to be revised. Thus, you might start with... A ---> B ----> C And revise it to... A ---> B \ \ \> C If you request a 'path' that is already in effect, it'll turn out as a NOOP. What you could do to accomplish what I think you want to do is to submit "*UN*S*U*B****** SET." -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "ofni.sailifa.ac" "@" "enworbbc")) <http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/> Christopher Browne (416) 673-4124 (land)
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Forcing an existing node to copy data fresh
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Forcing an existing node to copy data fresh
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list