Christopher Browne said:

> What you'll see on a subscriber node is that the current value of the
> sequence will be regularly reset to the then-present value on the origin
> node.

Ah, okay, so much the better.

> It's probably always possible to shoot yourself in the foot; keep those
> misplaced nextval()s to a "dull roar" and you should be OK :-).

I have no plans to allow code to modify any subscribed database.  I
realize there is no good to come from that.  I was curious what would
happen though.  I did read the design doc, and I saw it discussed sequence
replication, but I was still unclear, so thanks for letting me know.

I have to say, you guys did a fine job with Slony.  This is one of the
coolest things I have worked with in quite a while.  Other things are
going by the wayside ;)

Thanks for your help and thanks for Slony!