Tue Oct 11 08:32:32 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] The multi-master question
- Next message: [Slony1-general] The multi-master question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 20:08 -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon at 2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Any table can have one source. That seems to allow me to setup links so > > that: > > > > System1.Table1 -> System2.Table1 > > System2.Table2 -> System1.Table2 > > > > Yes? Good. Will that work for inherited tables too? Can I have: > > > > System1.Child1 inherits System1.Parent > > System1.Child2 inherits System1.Parent > > > > System2.Child1 inherits System2.Parent > > System2.Child2 inherits System2.Parent > > > > System1.Child1 -> System2.Child1 > > System2.Child2 -> System1.Child2 > > > > which is close enough to multi-master replication for most designs. ... > In principle, it ought to be possible. Good, thanks. > The one problem I'd foresee is that indices aren't shared across such > inheritance scenarios, so if the "child" tables get large, queries > across the "parent" might wind up not being as efficient as you'd > want. Are you saying a slony target table can't have an index on it? Why would you not put an index on both pieces of the inherited table? Best Regards, Simon Riggs
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] The multi-master question
- Next message: [Slony1-general] The multi-master question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list