On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:50:44AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 04:27:47PM -0700, elein wrote:
> > Yes, it should. But it doesn't.  I believe any message is ever
> > sent to the 3rd node. This is the same in my example.  See also the sl_setsync
> > table.  It has a reference to node 1 (or 10).
> 
> Do we have a reproducible case yet?  It sure looks like a bug, but
> without being able to isolate it, I dunno how we're going to fix it.
> 
> A
> 

Do you mean to ask whether you have one in house?  Both Chris
and Jan have looked at this and said there was a problem, IIRC.
This bug has now tripped up several people.  If necessary I can set 
up the repro on my machine. Let me know and I'll prioritize it.
Time is a little tight right now.

--elein

> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan  | ajs at crankycanuck.ca
> The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
> 		--George Orwell
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>