Mon Nov 14 20:24:20 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] current STABLE and HEAD
- Next message: [Slony1-general] current STABLE and HEAD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Nov 12, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > That said, do we want to continue making significant changes in this > branch, or just admit that this one didn't work as planned, and work > on HEAD and getting 1.2 out the door (and recommend to people that > maybe 1.1 isn't their best bet)? Unless 1.2 is around the corner, we need something that will work with Pg 8.1, and we need it soon. I think the main problem we have with releases is that it is very hard to regression test slony1. My vote is +1 to making a new 1.1 release with 8.1 support.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] current STABLE and HEAD
- Next message: [Slony1-general] current STABLE and HEAD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list