On November 1, 2005 02:36 pm, Philippe Ferreira <phil.f at worldonline.fr> 
wrote:
> However, as far a I'm concerned (and I think it would apply to any mass
> hosting service), in order to keep flexibility, and scalability, the
> best solution would be to keep 100 distinct clusters, but directed by a
> minimum of slon processes...

What exactly are you trying to achieve with this setup?  If the answer is 
near-real-time backups, then you should probably consider PITR instead of 
Slony.  It just seems unlikely to me that web hosting customers are going 
to grok the intricacies of having Slony added to their database 
environments.

-- 
In a world where the citizens of most developed nations have half their 
incomes wrested from them by the state (slaves only paid about a quarter, 
effectively), how widely supported do you think the idea of "freedom" 
really is? - Russ Nelson

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://gborg.postgresql.org/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20051102/3f8593d3/attachment.bin