Wed Nov 2 11:41:51 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Multiple clusters and memory usage...
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Multiple clusters and memory usage...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:50:05PM -0500, Rod Taylor wrote: > You can move around the master for a specific set but as Chris reminds > me failover itself is a global operation (performed only when the > original DB is no longer available). Yes, but as Chris also noted, if one database has failed in some way on a cluster such that you want to failover, that would seem to entail that the rest of them have too. For any case where that isn't true, you can still do MOVE SET. (Actually, I can think of a case where it might not be. If you're using tablespaces to put each of these on a disk, and you have a disk-controller failure for just one disk pair, say, then you might have a case. But that's already way more administrative burden than I assume the OP was going for.) A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary and imaginative work need not end up well. --Dennis Ritchie
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Multiple clusters and memory usage...
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Multiple clusters and memory usage...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list