I'm testing the beta as fast as I can.  Sorry for
the bad timing.  More beta testers would help.

--elein

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:40:17PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
> elein wrote:
> 
> >Be careful.  slon_start and slon_kill have slon_
> >prefixes.  Perhaps the state script should have slon_
> >instead of slony?
> >  
> >
> That was done with at least some thought :-).
> 
> - The "things that generate slonik scripts" have the slonik_ prefix
> - The "things that manipulate slon daemons" have the slon_ prefix
> - The one script that looks at some 'overall' stuff has the slony_ prefix
> 
> No accidents there!  The three "namespace partitions" are distinct in
> function.
> 
> >Thank you!  I do believe they will be more helpful
> >when people can easily identify what they can do
> >by looking at the script names. 
> >  
> >
> I'm just a bit grumpy that these sorts of things are only being pointed
> out at the very END of the process, when we're trying to get a release
> candidate out, which is the time when things are to be "cast in stone."
> 
> If this name change had been requested a couple months ago, I would have
> had no issues with it at all.
>