Christopher Browne wrote:

> I'm seeing the situation where there is a NULL sequence number in the
>
>4th data field for the ACCEPT_SET event, and that is causing the
>ACCEPT_SET event to fall over relatively silently when the
>remote_worker.c code tries to translate NULL into a sequence number.
>
>I'm particularly suspicious of a bug in the creation of the ACCEPT_SET
>event, which is a couple steps back from where you're seeing the problem.
>  
>
Confirmed, and I have a resolution to it that I just committed to CVS...