Tue Jun 21 22:50:03 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] what to consider for failover policy?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] what to consider for failover policy?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > of network connections failing. Once we start getting more users, this > > will all be redundant. The power supplies are redundant (triple setup) > > harddrives are redundant, redundant UPS's, etc. etc.. > > I have machines worth half a million bucks that are supposed to be > "all redundant", and break in surprising ways. Don't rely on this > promise for 5 9s. Or, NOT break in surprising ways. Outright broken is easy, but I've not seen anything for "it just became slow" type failover ;) --
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] what to consider for failover policy?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] what to consider for failover policy?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list