Wed Jan 26 22:24:13 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Support for named sets in slony1
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Node 1 required or not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On January 26, 2005 02:11 pm, Tim Goodaire wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I know that Chris has been working on code in Slony1 to support named > nodes. I'm wondering if there is any interest in support for named sets > also? > > It sure would be nice if we could refer to our sets by names like > "contact" or "billing", rather than "set 13" and "set 42". Since we will support cluster by name, node by name.. it only makes sence to support set by name and there for we should also support table/sequence by FQN since it is a unique name anyway. > > Or maybe people find remembering numbers easier than remembering names. :) > > Tim > > > - -- > Tim Goodaire 416-673-4126 tgoodair at ca.afilias.info > Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFB+BWCRI056rlRJ/YRAq3aAJ9zVICbQY21XooaTA4ZejYgHQhExwCdHARB > Cjoj21pcc9VxRG8KRybTYy8= > =WV8L > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general -- Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759 http://www.wavefire.com
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Support for named sets in slony1
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Node 1 required or not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list