Wed Jan 12 22:13:17 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] current slony1 limitations
- Next message: [Slony1-general] using forward vs. direct subscription
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have 3 nodes A,B,C. A and B are "clustered" such that B is just a backup for A, and needs to get all changes made on A replicated. A in its turn is a subscriber to a set of tables from C, and also has some tables for which it is master. Now, for B to be a full backup to A, it needs to be subscribed to the A-mastered tables, and to the set from C, as well. My question: is it better/more efficient for B to just subscribe directly to C, or for it to subscribe to C's set via A, with A having forwarding turned on? TIA for any information/opinions/corrections.... - DAP ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Parker Tazz Networks (401) 709-5130 ?
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] current slony1 limitations
- Next message: [Slony1-general] using forward vs. direct subscription
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list