Wed Jan 12 13:39:05 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] current slony1 limitations
- Next message: [Slony1-general] current slony1 limitations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 07:40:21AM -0500, David Parker wrote: > Oh, if I changed my oid fields to bytea, slony could replicate them? What I understand is that Slony can use any native data type (and the reason it can't do lo is because there's a special interface there, which is what causes the problem). Someone will surely correct me if I'm wrong. > I have to look into whether bytea would work for our app, of course - I > haven't used it before, but having those puppies slony-replicated would > be a huge help to me.... The big sticking point is escaping things properly so that the back end doesn't choke. Most interfaces have some automagic function for this. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] current slony1 limitations
- Next message: [Slony1-general] current slony1 limitations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list