On 2/23/2005 9:07 AM, hannu at skype.net wrote:
> I wonder if one database be can part of two clusters, if the tables
> belonging to these cliusters are kept separate ?

Yes, in that case each of the origins runs one slon and the 
dual-subscriber runs 2 of them.

The same effect can be achieved by keeping the tables just in separate 
set's, each with a different origin. The two origin databases need not 
be subscribed to each others sets, and the third "consolidation" 
database can be subscribed to both.

It's not 100% the same. If one of the origin databases is down, the 
other will not clean out old replication log information any more, so 
the two cluster install has it's pro's.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #