elein elein
Wed Aug 31 19:49:47 PDT 2005
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:25:07AM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2005 09:14, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > When I have three nodes with a set from A being replicated so
> >
> > A --> B --> C
> >
> > When are log records deleted from sl_log_1 on node A ?
> >
> > Is it when they are copied to B or when they are copied to C ?
> >
> > I have had times when node C is slow, and it seems the the records are
> > not deleted from sl_log_1 on A in this case. I this true ?
> 
> yes this is correct.  this is done so that when B fails you can tell C it's 
> new origin of A and you don;t loose any data in the process.

Shouldn't failover do that resub automatically?  If not it should.  
I think this is the problem with my failover bug.  C still references 
A in sl_setsync and sl_nodes, etc.

--elein

> 
> -- 
> Darcy Buskermolen
> Wavefire Technologies Corp.
> 
> http://www.wavefire.com
> ph: 250.717.0200
> fx: 250.763.1759
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
> 


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list