Wed Aug 31 19:49:47 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] question about sl_log_1 data lifetime
- Next message: [Slony1-general] question about sl_log_1 data lifetime
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:25:07AM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > On Tuesday 30 August 2005 09:14, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > Hi > > > > When I have three nodes with a set from A being replicated so > > > > A --> B --> C > > > > When are log records deleted from sl_log_1 on node A ? > > > > Is it when they are copied to B or when they are copied to C ? > > > > I have had times when node C is slow, and it seems the the records are > > not deleted from sl_log_1 on A in this case. I this true ? > > yes this is correct. this is done so that when B fails you can tell C it's > new origin of A and you don;t loose any data in the process. Shouldn't failover do that resub automatically? If not it should. I think this is the problem with my failover bug. C still references A in sl_setsync and sl_nodes, etc. --elein > > -- > Darcy Buskermolen > Wavefire Technologies Corp. > > http://www.wavefire.com > ph: 250.717.0200 > fx: 250.763.1759 > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] question about sl_log_1 data lifetime
- Next message: [Slony1-general] question about sl_log_1 data lifetime
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list