Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Christopher Browne wrote:
>
>> The Slony-I team is pleased to present the first beta release for
>> Slony-I version 1.1, the most most advanced replication solution for
>> the most advanced Open Source Database in the world.
>
>
> I'm experiencing a problem while compiling it on RHEL 4:
> ==================================================================
> make[2]: Entering directory 
> `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/slony1-1.1.0.beta1/doc/adminguide'
> { \
> echo "<!entity version \"HEAD_20050406\">"; \
> echo "<!entity majorversion \"`expr HEAD_20050406 : 
> '\([0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\)'`\">"; \
> } >version.sgml
> openjade:intro.sgml:148:30:E: document type does not allow element 
> "SECT1" here
> openjade:prerequisites.sgml:2:24:E: document type does not allow 
> element "SECT1" here
> openjade:installation.sgml:2:24:E: document type does not allow 
> element "SECT1" here
> openjade:concepts.sgml:2:20:E: document type does not allow element 
> "SECT1" here
> openjade:cluster.sgml:2:19:E: document type does not allow element 
> "SECT1" here
> openjade:defineset.sgml:2:24:E: document type does not allow element 
> "SECT1" here
> openjade:slony.sgml:33:11:E: end tag for "SECT1" omitted, but OMITTAG 
> NO was specified
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:35:14:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted, but 
> OMITTAG NO was specified
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:30:0: start tag was here
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:35:14:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted, but 
> OMITTAG NO was specified
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:26:10: start tag was here
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:35:14:E: end tag for "LISTITEM" omitted, but 
> OMITTAG NO was specified
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:26:0: start tag was here
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:35:14:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted, but 
> OMITTAG NO was specified
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:22:0: start tag was here
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:35:14:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted, but 
> OMITTAG NO was specified
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:16:0: start tag was here
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:35:14:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted, but 
> OMITTAG NO was specified
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:12:0: start tag was here
> openjade:plainpaths.sgml:35:14:E: end tag for "PARA" omitted, but 
> OMITTAG NO was specified
>
> Any comments?

Omitting plenty, this is mostly a result of your CATALOG file having an 
OMITTAG NO where others evidently had OMITTAG YES.  Presumably a 
difference between environments.

I'll see about running the SGML thru some normalization tools so that 
it'll work under either condition.