Fri Sep 24 16:07:47 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Purpose of sl_log_1 vs. sl_log_2?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Purpose of sl_log_1 vs. sl_log_2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Friday September 24 2004 8:53, Jan Wieck wrote: > On 9/24/2004 10:12 AM, Ed L. wrote: > > On Wednesday September 22 2004 8:42, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 06:19:50PM -0600, Ed L. wrote: > >> > Hmm. Adding 2 inserts for every update/delete/insert done by our > >> > applications would not be good for our performance. > >> > >> You misunderstand. It's not 2 inserts. It's one into one of the > >> tables, depending on which is active. > > > > The latest CVS code does 2 inserts by default. > > No, it does not. It only prepares the query plans for both log tables on > the first call to the log trigger. You never see the real execution of > saved SPI plans in the log. Ah, I see I misread the new log style *and* the code. Thx. Ed
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Purpose of sl_log_1 vs. sl_log_2?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Purpose of sl_log_1 vs. sl_log_2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list