Wed Sep 22 05:39:32 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] slon option semantics
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slon option semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday September 21 2004 6:57, Jan Wieck wrote: > On 9/17/2004 2:01 PM, Ed L. wrote: > > A few questions on slon command-line argument semantics... > > > > % slon -h > > usage: slon [options] clustername conninfo > > Options: > > -g <num> maximum SYNC group size (default 6) > > > > What are the units for the -g flag? Transactions? Rows? > > Number of SYNC events to cram together. So am I correct in assuming this is a way to batch SYNCs to the slave for efficiency sake? A higher number means more SYNCs batched and thus possibly longer delay before SYNCing with slave but less communication overhead? And a lower number ensures more timely SYNCs at the expense of increased master-slave traffic? Ed
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] slon option semantics
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slon option semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list