Andrew Sullivan ajs
Wed Nov 17 23:05:36 PST 2004
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:23:54PM -0700, Ed L. wrote:
> about tg_enabled as discussed here 19-Oct-2004.  Downtime for those 
> upgrades would not be feasible in many cases.  I would also like to submit 

Since you're using Slony, though, downtime should be minimal, right? 
We all know that major release upgrades in Postgres are always
drop-in replacements, after all ;-)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs at crankycanuck.ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well. 
		--Dennis Ritchie


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list