Thu Nov 11 17:04:26 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slow-ny
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Memory leak?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 11:55 -0500, Jan Wieck wrote: > > If the 1698717542 transaction was twice as long, it would have been > > falling behind. > > I guess the right strategy for grouping should be > > keep adding to the group until > a) exceeding absolute upper limit > b) discover change in minxid AND exceeding group size > > Does that sound reasonable to everyone? Agreed
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slow-ny
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Memory leak?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list