Tue Nov 9 22:43:18 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable subscribtion
- Next message: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable subscribtion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday November 9 2004 3:33, David Parker wrote: > sigh...no, no triggers on the table that I can see, and I'm %100 sure > I'm not telling slonik to ignore any, but seems like it has to be > something like that. Would a trigger firing show up in the server log? Here's a shot in the dark: I had an 8-hr copy set operation that looked great for hours, but aborted when slon got clobbered and rolled back all the copies. I saw another slon abort when it encountered what I guess was a conflict with concurrent autovacs (simple_heap_update error). I guess the way to verify is to see the commit line for that pid in the server log. You've probably already grepped your slon and server logs for errors... Ed > > Thanks. > > - DAP > > >-----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Wieck [mailto:JanWieck at Yahoo.com] > > >Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 5:02 PM > >To: David Parker > >Cc: Darcy Buskermolen; slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > >Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable > >subscribtion > > > >On 11/9/2004 2:43 PM, David Parker wrote: > >> You mentioned that a similar problem was seen on HP, but > > > >that the problem seemed to go away. Do you recall if the > >tables involved had constraints, as my problem table does? I'm > >probably grasping at straws, but I can't find any other > >differences with the other tables that are actually working OK. > > > >> Is there another level of debugging I can turn on in the > > > >server? If somehow a constraint cascade delete were firing, > >would it show up in the server log? > > > > > >As per the slon log, it actually shovels 218 bytes of data > >from copy to copy ... could it be that you have a trigger on > >that table which is told to be ignored (store trigger) and > >that then suppresses the actual insert by returning NULL? > >Grasping straws too ;-) > > > > > >Jan > > > >> Thanks. > >> > >> - DAP > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: David Parker > >>>Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 7:17 PM > >>>To: 'Darcy Buskermolen'; slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > >>>Subject: RE: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable > >>>subscribtion > >>> > >>>Sorry, I should have provided that info: > >>> > >>>Solaris 9/intel > >>>postgres 7.4.5 > >>>slony 1.0.2 > >>> > >>>same configuration on both sides. > >>> > >>>Thanks. > >>> > >>>- DAP > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: slony1-general-bounces at gborg.postgresql.org > >>>>[mailto:slony1-general-bounces at gborg.postgresql.org] On > >>> > >>>Behalf Of Darcy > >>> > >>>>Buskermolen > >>>>Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 6:49 PM > >>>>To: slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > >>>>Subject: Re: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable > >>>>subscribtion > >>>> > >>>>On November 8, 2004 03:28 pm, David Parker wrote: > >>>>> I am having a problem where the initial copy of data into > > > >a "slave" > > > >>>>> table seems to be getting lost. I have a table called > > > >"schema", and > > > >>>>> our application database gets installed with 2 records in > >>>> > >>>>this table. > >>>> > >>>>> I see the copy happening in the log, but when I look at the slave > >>>>> table after the subscription is done, it's empty. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have a couple of other pre-populated tables like this, but > >>>> > >>>>they are > >>>> > >>>>> not exhibiting the same behavior. The difference is that the > >>>> > >>>>"schema" > >>>> > >>>>> table has FK constraints pointing at it, and the other > >>>> > >>>>tables do not. > >>>> > >>>>> At the point when I am configuring replication, none of > > > >the tables > > > >>>>> with FKs pointing to "schema" table have any data in them, > >>>> > >>>>and I have > >>>> > >>>>> further verified that these constraints are defined "NO > >>>> > >>>>ACTION" on delete/update. > >>>> > >>>>> I have included what I think are the relevant portions of > > > >the slony > > > >>>>> log and the server log (-d 5). The server log shows the > >>>> > >>>>"analyze" done > >>>> > >>>>> by slon showing 2 records, which is what I expect to see. > >>>> > >>>>I've looked > >>>> > >>>>> elsewhere in the server log and don't see evidence (a constraint > >>>>> cascade or something) of a subsequent delete happening on > > > >the table. > > > >>>>> Any ideas for further places to look would be a great help. > >>>> > >>>>Some background information would be usefull namely: > >>>>Origin Database version > >>>> OS version/distro > >>>> Hardware type > >>>> Slon Version > >>>> Slony Schema version > >>>> > >>>>Subscriber Datablase version > >>>> OS version/distro > >>>> Hardware type > >>>> Slon version > >>>> Slony Schema version > >>>> > >>>>I ask this because there were reports of something simular > > > >to this on > > > >>>>HP's > >>>>Tru64 testdrive platform and when we went to debug it in depth the > >>>>errors went away. > >>>> > >>>>> slon log: > >>>>> > >>>>>============================================================== > >>>> > >>>>========= > >>>> > >>>>>==== ========================= DEBUG2 remoteWorkerThread_1: > >>>> > >>>>copy table > >>>> > >>>>>public.schema > >>>>> DEBUG3 remoteWorkerThread_1: table public.schema does not require > >>>>>Slony-I serial key DEBUG2 remoteWorkerThread_1: 218 bytes > >>> > >>>copied for > >>> > >>>>>table public.schema DEBUG2 remoteWorkerThread_1: 0.471 > >>>> > >>>>seconds to copy > >>>> > >>>>>table public.schema > >>>>>============================================================== > >>>> > >>>>========= > >>>> > >>>>>==== > >>>>>========================= > >>>>> > >>>>> server log: > >>>>> > >>>>>============================================================== > >>>> > >>>>========= > >>>> > >>>>>==== ========================= DEBUG: StartTransactionCommand > >>>>> LOG: statement: delete from public.schema; copy > > > >public.schema from > > > >>>>>stdin; > >>>>> DEBUG: parse tree: > >>>>> DETAIL: {QUERY :commandType 4 :querySource 0 :canSetTag true > >>>>> > >>>>>:utilityStmt <> > >>>>>: > >>>>> :resultRelation 1 :into <> :hasAggs false :hasSubLinks > >>>> > >>>>false :rtable ({RTE > >>>> > >>>>> :alias <> :eref {ALIAS :aliasname schema :colnames > >>>> > >>>>("dbid" "tuid" > >>>> > >>>>> "foundryversion" "name" "description" "objecttype" > >>>> > >>>>"generic" "state" > >>>> > >>>>> "visible" "schematype" "namespace" "content")} :rtekind 0 > >>>>> > >>>>:relid 17626 > >>>>: > >>>>> :inh true > >>>>> : > >>>>> :inFromCl false :checkForRead false :checkForWrite true > >>>>: > >>>>:checkAsUser 0}) > >>>>: > >>>>> :jointree {FROMEXPR :fromlist ({RANGETBLREF :rtindex > >>>> > >>>>1}) :quals <>} > >>>> > >>>>> : :rowMarks > >>>>> > >>>>> () :targetList <> :groupClause <> :havingQual <> > >>>>> > >>>>:distinctClause <> > >>>>: > >>>>> :sortClause <> :limitOffset <> :limitCount <> :setOperations <> > >>>>> :resultRelations ()} > >>>>> > >>>>> DEBUG: rewritten parse tree: > >>>>> DETAIL: ({QUERY :commandType 4 :querySource 0 :canSetTag true > >>>>> > >>>>> :utilityStmt <> > >>>>> : > >>>>> :resultRelation 1 :into <> :hasAggs false :hasSubLinks > >>>> > >>>>false :rtable ({RTE > >>>> > >>>>> :alias <> :eref {ALIAS :aliasname schema :colnames > >>>> > >>>>("dbid" "tuid" > >>>> > >>>>> "foundryversion" "name" "description" "objecttype" > >>>> > >>>>"generic" "state" > >>>> > >>>>> "visible" "schematype" "namespace" "content")} :rtekind 0 > >>>>> > >>>>:relid 17626 > >>>>: > >>>>> :inh true > >>>>> : > >>>>> :inFromCl false :checkForRead false :checkForWrite true > >>>>: > >>>>:checkAsUser 0}) > >>>>: > >>>>> :jointree {FROMEXPR :fromlist ({RANGETBLREF :rtindex > >>>> > >>>>1}) :quals <>} > >>>> > >>>>> : :rowMarks > >>>>> > >>>>> () :targetList <> :groupClause <> :havingQual <> > >>>>> > >>>>:distinctClause <> > >>>>: > >>>>> :sortClause <> :limitOffset <> :limitCount <> :setOperations <> > >>>>> :resultRelations ()}) > >>>>> > >>>>> DEBUG: plan: > >>>>> DETAIL: {SEQSCAN :startup_cost 0.00 :total_cost 1.02 > >: > >:plan_rows 2 > >: > >>>>> :plan_width 6 > >>>>> : > >>>>> :targetlist ({TARGETENTRY :resdom {RESDOM :resno 1 > >>>>: > >>>>:restype 27 :restypmod > >>>>: > >>>>> : -1 resname ctid :ressortgroupref 0 :resorigtbl 0 > >>>>: > >>>>:resorigcol 0 :resjunk > >>>>: > >>>>> : true} expr {VAR :varno 1 :varattno -1 :vartype 27 > >>>>: > >>>>:vartypmod -1 > >>>>: > >>>>> : :varlevelsup 0 varnoold 1 :varoattno -1}}) :qual <> > >>>>: > >>>>:lefttree <> > >>>>: > >>>>> : :righttree <> :initPlan <> extParam () :allParam () > >>>>: > >>>>:nParamExec 0 > >>>>: > >>>>> : :scanrelid 1} > >>>>> > >>>>> DEBUG: ProcessQuery > >>>>> DEBUG: parse tree: > >>>>> DETAIL: {QUERY :commandType 5 :querySource 0 :canSetTag true > >>>>> > >>>>> :utilityStmt ? > >>>>> : > >>>>> :resultRelation 0 :into <> :hasAggs false :hasSubLinks > >>>> > >>>>false :rtable <> > >>>> > >>>>> :jointree <> :rowMarks () :targetList <> :groupClause > >>>> > >>>><> :havingQual <> > >>>> > >>>>> :distinctClause <> :sortClause <> :limitOffset <> :limitCount <> > >>>>> :setOperations <> :resultRelations ()} > >>>>> > >>>>> DEBUG: rewritten parse tree: > >>>>> DETAIL: ({QUERY :commandType 5 :querySource 0 :canSetTag true > >>>>> > >>>>> :utilityStmt ? > >>>>> : > >>>>> :resultRelation 0 :into <> :hasAggs false :hasSubLinks > >>>> > >>>>false :rtable <> > >>>> > >>>>> :jointree <> :rowMarks () :targetList <> :groupClause > >>>> > >>>><> :havingQual <> > >>>> > >>>>> :distinctClause <> :sortClause <> :limitOffset <> :limitCount <> > >>>>> :setOperations <> :resultRelations ()}) > >>>>> > >>>>> DEBUG: ProcessUtility > >>>>> DEBUG: find_in_dynamic_libpath: trying > >>>> > >>>>"/home/dparker/install/ed9i04/tazz/postgresql/lib/slony1_funcs" > >>>> > >>>> CONTEXT: > >>>>> COPY schema, line 1: "1 > >>>> > >>>>THISISTHEMOTHEROFALLSCHEMASRIGHT 1.0 XSD Fake > >>>> > >>>>> schema representing the xsd: schema schema f \N > >>>> > >>>>t \N..." DEBUG: > >>>>> find_in_dynamic_libpath: trying > >>>>> "/home/dparker/install/ed9i04/tazz/lib/slony1_funcs" > >>>> > >>>>CONTEXT: COPY schema, > >>>> > >>>>> line 1: "1 THISISTHEMOTHEROFALLSCHEMASRIGHT 1.0 > >>>> > >>>>XSD Fake schema > >>>> > >>>>> representing the xsd: schema schema f \N t > >>>> > >>>>\N..." DEBUG: > >>>>> find_in_dynamic_libpath: trying > >>>> > >>>>"/home/dparker/install/ed9i04/tazz/postgresql/lib/slony1_funcs. > >>>> > >>>>so" CONTEXT: > >>>>> COPY schema, line 1: "1 > >>>> > >>>>THISISTHEMOTHEROFALLSCHEMASRIGHT 1.0 XSD Fake > >>>> > >>>>> schema representing the xsd: schema schema f \N > >>>> > >>>>t \N..." DEBUG: > >>>>> CommitTransactionCommand > >>>>> DEBUG: StartTransactionCommand > >>>>> LOG: statement: analyze public.schema; > >>>>> DEBUG: parse tree: > >>>>> DETAIL: {QUERY :commandType 5 :querySource 0 :canSetTag true > >>>>> > >>>>> :utilityStmt ? > >>>>> : > >>>>> :resultRelation 0 :into <> :hasAggs false :hasSubLinks > >>>> > >>>>false :rtable <> > >>>> > >>>>> :jointree <> :rowMarks () :targetList <> :groupClause > >>>> > >>>><> :havingQual <> > >>>> > >>>>> :distinctClause <> :sortClause <> :limitOffset <> :limitCount <> > >>>>> :setOperations <> :resultRelations ()} > >>>>> > >>>>> DEBUG: rewritten parse tree: > >>>>> DETAIL: ({QUERY :commandType 5 :querySource 0 :canSetTag true > >>>>> > >>>>> :utilityStmt ? > >>>>> : > >>>>> :resultRelation 0 :into <> :hasAggs false :hasSubLinks > >>>> > >>>>false :rtable <> > >>>> > >>>>> :jointree <> :rowMarks () :targetList <> :groupClause > >>>> > >>>><> :havingQual <> > >>>> > >>>>> :distinctClause <> :sortClause <> :limitOffset <> :limitCount <> > >>>>> :setOperations <> :resultRelations ()}) > >>>>> > >>>>> DEBUG: ProcessUtility > >>>>> DEBUG: analyzing "public.schema" > >>>>> DEBUG: "schema": 1 pages, 2 rows sampled, 2 estimated total rows > >>>>> DEBUG: CommitTransactionCommand > >>>>> > >>>>>============================================================== > >>>> > >>>>========= > >>>> > >>>>>==== > >>>>>========================= > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> - DAP > >>>> > >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>------------ > >>>> > >>>>>------- David Parker Tazz Networks (401) 709-5130 > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Slony1-general mailing list > >>>>> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > >>>>> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>Darcy Buskermolen > >>>>Wavefire Technologies Corp. > >>>>ph: 250.717.0200 > >>>>fx: 250.763.1759 > >>>>http://www.wavefire.com > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>Slony1-general mailing list > >>>>Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > >>>>http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Slony1-general mailing list > >> Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > >> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > > > >-- > >#============================================================== > >========# > ># It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for > >being right. # > ># Let's break this rule - forgive me. > > # > >#================================================== > >JanWieck at Yahoo.com # > > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at gborg.postgresql.org > http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable subscribtion
- Next message: [Slony1-general] losing data on initial enable subscribtion
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list