On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:47:57AM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
> 
> Hmmm, it would make more sense for Slony to internally track the
> progress of each sequence, so it doesn't blindly do setval() each timem
> wouldn't it?

What does it mean "to internally track the progress of each
sequence"?  Does this mean that when a sequence is updated, Slony
somehow gets notified and remembers the value?  That sounds like a
way to make nextval() slower.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs at crankycanuck.ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
		--Roger Brinner