This has been applied, thank you


On June 18, 2004 11:18 am, Christopher Browne wrote:
> One thing that has kept "tweaking" me the wrong way is the use of the
> phrase "full qualified name."
>
> The more usual usage of "FQ*N" is of "fully qualified [something]
> name," as with FQDN, which stands for "fully qualified domain name,"
> that phrasing being used widely in IETF RFCs.
>
> The following patch should allow adding in the "y" to "fully".
>
> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/slony1/slony1-engine/src/slonik/scan.l,v
> retrieving revision 1.15
> diff -c -u -r1.15 scan.l
> cvs server: conflicting specifications of output style
> --- scan.l	12 Jun 2004 04:59:32 -0000	1.15
> +++ scan.l	18 Jun 2004 18:10:49 -0000
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
>  for				{ return K_FOR;					}
>  forward			{ return K_FORWARD;				}
>  full			{ return K_FULL;				}
> +fully			{ return K_FULL;				}
>  functions		{ return K_FUNCTIONS;			}
>  id				{ return K_ID;					}
>  init			{ return K_INIT;				}

-- 
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
ph: 250.717.0200
fx:  250.763.1759
http://www.wavefire.com