Fri Dec 17 16:21:33 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Indexes on replicas
- Next message: [Slony1-general] about Slony-I failover question bver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:31:29PM -0500, cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote: > > Question: To what degree do you get transactions rolled back in the > "master" system? > > If substantially all transactions succeed, then replication will mean that > you need more or less as many vacuums and analyzes going on against the > replicas as on the "master." But you might need a slightly larger FSM on the replicas, because depending on how you have things set up, the replicas may get all the table churn in a much bigger hunk than the origin did. -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir? --attr. John Maynard Keynes
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Indexes on replicas
- Next message: [Slony1-general] about Slony-I failover question bver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list