Andrew Sullivan ajs
Fri Dec 17 16:21:33 PST 2004
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 10:31:29PM -0500, cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info wrote:
> 
> Question: To what degree do you get transactions rolled back in the
> "master" system?
> 
> If substantially all transactions succeed, then replication will mean that
> you need more or less as many vacuums and analyzes going on against the
> replicas as on the "master."

But you might need a slightly larger FSM on the replicas, because
depending on how you have things set up, the replicas may get all the
table churn in a much bigger hunk than the origin did.

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs at crankycanuck.ca
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions.  What do you do sir?
		--attr. John Maynard Keynes


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list