Sat Dec 11 06:00:47 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Adding tables to an existing set in Slony1?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Question about table set ordering, and adding tables to an existing set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> It looks to me that the problem with your script is that your syntax > here is wrong: > > set add table ( set id = $TEMP_SET_ID, origin = 1, id = 111, full > qualified name = 'public.foo' ); > set add table ( set id = $TEMP_SET_ID, origin = 1, id = 112, full > qualified name = 'public.bar' ); > > It's not "full qualified name". It's "fully qualified name". Actually, both syntaxes are legitimate, accepted by the slonik parser. Originally, the parser used the phrase "full qualified name"; the word "fully" is more appropriate, so I added that to slonik's lexicon. > Your script was probably just telling you 'failure', but I'll bet that > there were some messages about > your syntax error in the slony logs. Seeing the exact error messages would be handy; if it had been a parser error, that would lead to the entire script being rejected. The try block wouldn't fail; it would never get attempted.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Adding tables to an existing set in Slony1?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Question about table set ordering, and adding tables to an existing set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list