Mon Oct 22 13:47:50 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] slony1-engine/src/slon remote_worker.c
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] slony1-engine/doc/adminguide slonik_ref.sgml
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Update of /home/cvsd/slony1/slony1-engine/doc/adminguide
In directory main.slony.info:/tmp/cvs-serv19930
Modified Files:
Tag: REL_1_2_STABLE
loganalysis.sgml
Log Message:
Document new case that comes up with log shipping where fighting
over access to log numbering can lead to a serialization error.
Index: loganalysis.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvsd/slony1/slony1-engine/doc/adminguide/loganalysis.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.4.2.4
retrieving revision 1.4.2.5
diff -C2 -d -r1.4.2.4 -r1.4.2.5
*** loganalysis.sgml 6 Jun 2007 22:17:10 -0000 1.4.2.4
--- loganalysis.sgml 22 Oct 2007 20:47:48 -0000 1.4.2.5
***************
*** 213,216 ****
--- 213,226 ----
<para> Probably means that we just filled up a filesystem... </para></listitem>
+
+ <listitem><para> <command>ERROR remoteWorkerThread_%d: "update "_slony_regress1".sl_archive_counter set ac_num = ac_num + 1, ac_timestamp = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP; select ac_num, ac_timestamp from "_slony_regress1".sl_archive_counter; " PGRES_FATAL_ERROR ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update</command> </para>
+
+ <para> This may occasionally occur when using logshipping; this will
+ typically happen if there are 3 or more nodes, and there is an attempt
+ to concurrently process events sourced from different nodes. This
+ does not represent any serious problem; &slony1; will retry the event
+ which failed without the need for administrative intervention. </para>
+ </listitem>
+
</itemizedlist>
</sect3>
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] slony1-engine/src/slon remote_worker.c
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] slony1-engine/doc/adminguide slonik_ref.sgml
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-commit mailing list