Tue Mar 14 10:47:23 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: It wasn't clear to a Gentle Reader that TRUNCATE is not a
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Explain logging levels (-d option) for slon a bit better
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Log Message: ----------- Note in slon documentation the downside to using the "lag interval" Modified Files: -------------- slony1-engine/doc/adminguide: slon.sgml (r1.25 -> r1.26) -------------- next part -------------- Index: slon.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/slony1/slony1-engine/doc/adminguide/slon.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.26 diff -Ldoc/adminguide/slon.sgml -Ldoc/adminguide/slon.sgml -u -w -r1.25 -r1.26 --- doc/adminguide/slon.sgml +++ doc/adminguide/slon.sgml @@ -342,6 +342,16 @@ causes events to be ignored until they reach the age corresponding to the interval. </para> + + <warning><para> There is a concommittant downside to this lag; + events that require all nodes to synchronize, as typically + happens with <xref linkend="stmtfailover"> and <xref + linkend="stmtmoveset">, will have to wait for this lagging + node. </para> + + <para> That might not be ideal behaviour at failover time, or at + the time when you want to run <xref + linkend="stmtddlscript">. </para></warning> </listitem> </varlistentry>
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: It wasn't clear to a Gentle Reader that TRUNCATE is not a
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Explain logging levels (-d option) for slon a bit better
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-commit mailing list