Thu Jul 27 12:52:20 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Problem with sequence handling introduced when Chris added
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By xfade: Add closing tags and remove some warnings.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Log Message:
-----------
Fix faq.sgml error. It seems you can not have two questions in the same qandaentry?
Modified Files:
--------------
slony1-engine/doc/adminguide:
faq.sgml (r1.60 -> r1.61)
-------------- next part --------------
Index: faq.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/slony1/slony1-engine/doc/adminguide/faq.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.60
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -Ldoc/adminguide/faq.sgml -Ldoc/adminguide/faq.sgml -u -w -r1.60 -r1.61
--- doc/adminguide/faq.sgml
+++ doc/adminguide/faq.sgml
@@ -465,9 +465,6 @@
<qandaentry>
<question><para> When can I shut down &lslon; processes?</para></question>
-<question><para> Are there risks to doing so? How about
-benefits?</para></question>
-
<answer><para> Generally, it's no big deal to shut down a &lslon;
process. Each one is <quote>merely</quote> a &postgres; client,
managing one node, which spawns threads to manage receiving events
@@ -512,6 +509,11 @@
when it comes back up. But that is only a concern if that &lslon; is
down for an extended period of time; shutting it down for a few
seconds shouldn't cause any great problem. </para> </answer>
+</qandaentry>
+
+<qandaentry>
+<question><para> Are there risks to doing so? How about
+benefits?</para></question>
<answer><para> In short, if you don't have something like an 18
hour <command>COPY_SET</command> under way, it's normally not at all a
- Previous message: [Slony1-commit] By cbbrowne: Problem with sequence handling introduced when Chris added
- Next message: [Slony1-commit] By xfade: Add closing tags and remove some warnings.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-commit mailing list