http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248

--- Comment #3 from Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> 2011-11-07 09:59:12 PST ---
We also have no code to drop sequences from the _offline tracking table in
response to a DROP_SET or DROP_SEQUENCE.  This sounds like it could cause
problems if later you add the set/sequence back again.

Also if someone changes the name of the sequence via EXECUTE SCRIPT things will
again break.

Why are we tracking the relationship between the sequence id and the sequence
name?  Would we be better off not passing the name instead of the id to
sequenceSetValue_offline?  Does anyone remember the reason why the tracking
table was added in the first place?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.