http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174

--- Comment #7 from Jan Wieck <janwieck at yahoo.com> 2011-01-27 08:19:26 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Proposed...  Add a table that will be replicated via event publishing that
> captures tuples of the form [excluder, excludee]
> 
> That is, node [excluder] will ignore events coming from node [excludee].
> 
> (Open question: Will it just be SYNC events that are ignored?  Seems quite
> likely apropos...)

This definition is different from the original and changes the semantics
fundamentally.

The original idea is to "assume" confirmations in order to avoid keeping events
and log data for distant remote nodes.

That does not mean that we ignore events at all. It means that we don't care
when a node 2 hops away catches up to them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.