Fri Jul 18 09:46:01 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] Re: A possible bug in Slony test_slony_state-dbi.pl
- Next message: [Slony1-bugs] A minor bug-fix left-out in version 1.5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55 Summary: Possible buffer overflow in slon, still happens as of 1.2.14 Product: Slony-I Version: 1.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: low Component: slon AssignedTo: slony1-bugs at lists.slony.info ReportedBy: ahodgson at simkin.ca CC: slony1-bugs at lists.slony.info Estimated Hours: 0.0 Once in a while, I experience a problem replicating a new set, where the slon remote worker thread is terminated by a signal 11. I'm not much of a C programmer, so I haven't been able to patch this myself. I don't know how much of the following is relevant, but here is what I do know: It only occurs when debugging is set at 2 or higher. According to strace, the last thing the process does before receiving the sig 11 is output the log entry "syncing set %d with %d table(s) from provider %d\n" (with real data of course), which appears to be called from remote_worker.c at line 4232. The log entry is fully output before the thread is killed. In my case, it always happens on set id 100, which I use as a temporary set when adding new tables and sequences, and only on the first sync of the set after subscribing it to a new node. Reducing the debugging to 0 has so far gotten past the issue all 3 times it has happened, and later syncs at a higher debug level work fine. It's not reproducible except at the specific time it's happening (ie. I don't have a test case that can demonstrate it). I've looked at the logging code and can't see a buffer issue in it. I think probably it's just causing an interaction with the real problem elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
- Previous message: [Slony1-bugs] Re: A possible bug in Slony test_slony_state-dbi.pl
- Next message: [Slony1-bugs] A minor bug-fix left-out in version 1.5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-bugs mailing list